Creating Safe Spaces: Tackling Mental Health Challenges for Autistic Learners

It is essential to begin this article by acknowledging that every learner with ASD is unique and may face varying challenges and accommodations that must be considered. Please note that this article does not aim to provide a comprehensive overview of every aspect related to individuals with autism. Rather, it serves as a resource to promote awareness and offer insights into the topic and is grounded in both empirical research and anecdotal evidence.

*This article approaches the topic through the lens of the social model of disability, focusing on how societal and environmental factors shape the experiences of individuals with autism.

First published online December 03, 2024
Kelsey Tilley


Keywords: autism; multimodal learning; social-emotional learning; inclusive education; student-centered; Waldorf education; neuroeducation

In this article, we start by delving into the models of disability and then explore how the UK and US address educational and mental health support for autistic students, examining key programs like The Link Programme and Place2Be in the UK and comparing them to US initiatives. We discuss teacher shortages, inadequate training, the impact of corporal punishment, insurance coverage challenges in the US, and disparities in access and funding. This analysis aims to identify best practices and highlight areas for reform to improve support for neurodiverse students in both countries.

Could understanding and addressing these ten mental health barriers faced by autistic students unlock the potential for a more supportive and thriving educational environment?

Brief Overview of Autism

The school bell rings as the teacher raises their voice over the noise, reminding students, "Don’t forget! Your papers are due first thing tomorrow!" The room comes to life as children grab their book bags and chatter, rushing out to their next class. The hallways explode with the chaos of slamming lockers, overlapping voices, and hurried footsteps weaving through the crowd. For most students, it’s just another day, the noise and hustle and bustle fading into the background as they wave to their friend on the way to class. But for an autistic student, this environment can be overwhelming, triggering sensory overload or even an autistic meltdown. In that moment, anxiety and overwhelm can escalate, turning an ordinary school day into a series of barriers for them.

To support autistic learners, education must encompass more than just academics. It requires creating an environment that is mindful of sensory and mental health needs, creating spaces where students feel safe, understood, and helps them build on their strengths and potential.

Creating a Safe Space

What does it mean to create a safe space? For autistic students, creating a safe space means curating an environment where they feel free to be themselves and know they are supported and accepted in their unique challenges, differences, and needs. It involves designing an atmosphere that is as accommodating and inclusive as possible. While not all barriers can be eliminated, a safe space focuses on helping students learn to navigate and cope with these barriers while providing the encouragement and resources needed to manage them constructively.

Ten Barriers Related to Mental Health

Barrier 1: Communication

Communication is a fundamental part of education, yet many autistic students face significant barriers when traditional methods of communication are exclusively used in the learning environment. Communication differences in autistic students may include but not be limited to:

  • Challenges with verbal communication

  • Reliance on nonspeaking methods

  • Analytical approaches to expressing and understanding ideas

  • Difficulties in clearly articulating thoughts

  • Difficulty interpreting tone, body language, or facial expression

  • Delayed speech development or limited verbal communication

  • Delayed Processing

  • Challenges with initiating or maintaining conversations

  • Echolalia

  • Infodumping

  • Vocal Stimming

Impact on Mental Health:

When safe spaces are not created and available for the autistic student surrounding communication, it can have a profound negative impact on their mental health.

According to the NHS in the U.K., “The definition of mental health in the national ‘No Health without Mental Health’ policy is that it is a positive state of mind and body, feeling safe and able to cope, with a sense of connection with people, communities and the wider environment.”

The NHS states the following about well-being: “Wellbeing is not just the absence of ill health. It includes the way that people feel about themselves and their lives. In the absence of a singular definition, it is generally thought to be made up of things like the experience of positive emotions, people’s perceptions that the things they do in their lives are meaningful and worthwhile, and life satisfaction. Wellbeing is influenced by physical and mental health and in turn has an influence on the experience and outcomes of different health conditions.”

Conceptual Models of Disability

When comparing autism support in education between the UK and the US, both countries shape their educational systems of support differently. There are three primary models that influence this support: the medical model, social model, and neurodiversity model. These models influence how autism is understood, how support is structured, and how mental health is addressed in schools.

Social Model of Disability

In the UK, educational policies are built around the social model of disability. This model advocates for adapting environments to accommodate autistic individuals. The model shifts focus away from individual differences, highlighting that disability arises from inaccessible environments and societal barriers, rather than a person’s condition, impairment, or difference, and encourages society to remove these obstacles to foster more inclusive spaces for everyone. For example, an Autistic person may experience challenges in environments with overwhelming sensory stimuli, such as bright lights or loud noises, which can make social interactions or certain tasks more difficult. However, in a calm, structured environment with clear communication and sensory accommodations, their Autism does not present a barrier, allowing them to engage and contribute effectively. The UK's SEND framework and the implementation of Education, Health, and Care Plans (EHCPs) emphasize tailoring the educational environment to fit the student’s needs, promoting well-being through inclusion, and calls for a proactive approach to ensure these adjustments are made in a way that empowers the student despite any needs they may have.

Building on those principles, schools and learning environments can implement specific adaptations that promote greater inclusion and comfort for autistic students. These adaptations may include providing visual aids, alternative assessments, and structured routines that accommodate diverse learning styles. Additionally, sensory-friendly environments such as quiet spaces with dim lighting and the use of noise-canceling headphones help to reduce overstimulation. Flexible seating arrangements and alternative communication tools, like visual or speech-assistive technology, can make learning more accessible.

In Practice

For example, a UK student might have access to a sensory-friendly classroom, equipped with dimmed lighting and designated quiet spaces to retreat when feeling overwhelmed. This environment is specifically designed to accommodate sensory sensitivities, rather than focusing on correcting their behavior. Instead of attempting to modify or reduce behaviors like stimming, mental health services in this setting aim to support the student by providing tools for self-regulation, such as sensory toys or noise-canceling headphones. These adjustments ensure that the student feels comfortable, supported, and included in the learning environment. This helps to reduce anxiety and promote mental well-being.

Impact on Mental Health and Well-being

The social model of disability has an overall positive impact on the mental health on autistic students because it creates an inclusive and supportive environment. This model transforms the focus of seeing autism as an individual impairment that needs to be fixed to addressing societal and environmental barriers that hinder inclusion. By removing these barriers and adapting environments to meet diverse needs, learning is more accessible because it reduces challenges while creating a more inclusive environment. This approach also encourages autonomy and self-advocacy, which improves mental health outcomes, as students are not pressured to conform to neurotypical norms but are instead supported in their unique ways of interacting with the world.

Medical Model of Disability

By contrast, in the US, autism support in education has traditionally been influenced by the medical model, which sees autism as a disorder that requires intervention or treatment. Under the medical model, educational strategies often focus on therapies and interventions aimed at improving or "correcting" behaviors associated with autism. This is reflected in programs like Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA), which are commonly used in US schools.

In Practice

For example, a student in the US might receive ABA sessions designed to help them fit in with their neurotypical peers. These sessions typically focus on decreasing behaviors like hand-flapping or avoiding eye contact, which are viewed as socially inappropriate in neurotypical settings. The goal of these interventions is often to help the student conform to social norms, with the assumption that reducing these behaviors will improve their social interactions. Mental health services in this context might target reducing symptoms of anxiety or stress caused by social challenges, but without necessarily addressing the sensory overload or environmental factors that contribute to the student's distress.

Impact on Mental Health and Well-being

The medical model of disability views autism as a condition to be treated or cured and can negatively impact the mental health of autistic students. This model focuses on interventions aimed at reducing or eliminating autistic traits, often placing pressure on students to conform to neurotypical norms. As a result, many autistic students may feel inadequate and alienated. The focus on behavior modification through ABA has been criticized by several autism advocates and researchers, including Ari Ne'eman, co-founder of the Autistic Self-Advocacy Network (ASAN), who argues that ABA’s emphasis on making autistic individuals appear neurotypical often disregards the autistic person’s autonomy and sense of self. Researchers such as Michelle Dawson, have further criticized ABA for its focus on compliance, which can result in emotional harm, including anxiety and low self-esteem, by discouraging natural behaviors like stimming​.

Neurodiversity Model of Disability

There has also been another model gaining increasing popularity in the U.S., the neurodiversity model, particularly in advocacy and some progressive educational settings. The neurodiversity model views autism as a natural variation in human development, celebrating differences rather than viewing differences as deficits, and promoting mental wellbeing by fostering acceptance of autistic traits.

Impact on Mental Health and Well-being

The neurodiversity model positively impacts the mental health and well-being of autistic students by promoting acceptance and reducing stigma. This approach encourages students to embrace their unique identities, leading to increased self-esteem and a sense of belonging. By creating environments that accept behaviors like stimming rather than suppressing them, the model helps reduce anxiety and stress. Sensory-friendly accommodations and flexible learning approaches further contribute to a supportive setting where students feel empowered. The model also fosters self-advocacy, giving autistic students control over their needs and promoting inclusive peer relationships, which reduces social isolation and enhances overall emotional well-being.

In Practice

For example, a student who flaps their hands when excited would not be discouraged from doing so. Instead, the school would create an environment where such behaviors are accepted and understood. Mental health services in this context would focus on empowering the student to embrace their unique way of expressing emotions, while also fostering an inclusive atmosphere by teaching peers to appreciate and respect differences in communication and behavior.

Key Differences Summarized:

The UK and US utilize contrasting models of disability in education, which influence approaches to autism support, environment adaptation, and mental health. Use the dropdown menu below to view a summarized comparison of these models.

    • Environmental Adaptation: Disability is seen as arising from environmental and societal barriers, not from individual impairment.

    • Inclusive Environment: Focus on modifying school settings (e.g., sensory-friendly spaces) to accommodate students’ needs rather than changing their behaviors.

    • Support for Autonomy: Emphasizes self-regulation tools, like sensory aids, rather than interventions that alter autistic traits.

    • Mental Health Impact: Fosters mental well-being by reducing anxiety and promoting a supportive environment where students feel included and respected.

    • Focus on Intervention: Autism is viewed as a disorder that requires intervention, with educational strategies focusing on "correcting" behaviors.

    • Behavior Modification: Emphasis on therapies like Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA) to reduce traits such as hand-flapping or lack of eye contact, aligning students with neurotypical norms.

    • Less Emphasis on Environment: Limited focus on adapting school environments for sensory needs; support typically targets reducing anxiety without addressing sensory triggers.

    • Mental Health Impact: Can negatively impact mental health by pressuring students to conform to neurotypical standards, potentially leading to feelings of inadequacy or alienation.

    • Acceptance of Differences: Autism is seen as a natural variation, promoting acceptance of autistic traits rather than viewing them as deficits.

    • Celebration of Individuality: Environments are adapted to welcome behaviors like stimming, focusing on acceptance rather than suppression.

    • Empowerment through Self-Advocacy: Students are encouraged to advocate for their needs and express their identity, promoting inclusion and peer understanding.

    • Positive Mental Health Impact: Builds self-esteem, reduces stress, and enhances emotional well-being by fostering a sense of belonging and respect for neurodiversity.

SEND and Mental Health Support

In the UK, the Children and Families Act (2014) and the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) Code of Practice lay the foundation for how schools support children with special educational needs, including those with mental health concerns.

The Children and Families Act enacted in 2014 and was an act of legislation in the UK that completely overhauled the services provided to children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). One of the key guidelines of the Act is the focus on integrating health and education services to create a holistic approach to supporting children and young people with SEND, including those with mental health needs.

Under the SEND Code of Practice, schools are required to adopt an early identification approach to ensure that children receive support as soon as possible, particularly in recognizing and addressing mental health concerns that are often accompanied by learning difficulties. Schools are expected to adopt a whole-school approach to mental health, fostering emotional well-being throughout the school environment. This includes providing staff training to help teachers identify early signs of mental health issues and ensuring they are equipped to offer appropriate support. Schools must collaborate with third party mental health services to develop tailored support plans for students, ensuring they receive comprehensive care that allows them to thrive both academically and emotionally.

IDEA, ADA, 504 and Mental Health Support

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act collectively ensure that students with disabilities, including those with mental health needs, receive equal access to education and necessary accommodations. Under IDEA, schools are required to develop Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) for eligible students, outlining tailored support and services to meet their specific needs. IEPs ensure that students receive appropriate instruction and accommodations to succeed in the classroom.

Similarly, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act prohibits discrimination and requires that schools provide accommodations for students with disabilities, even if they do not qualify for an IEP under IDEA. Together, these laws promote an inclusive educational environment by ensuring that schools address both academic and mental health needs, providing students with the support required to thrive. Schools must collaborate with families and professionals to create and implement these plans, ensuring that students' rights and needs are met holistically.

Key Differences Summarized:

UK and US support structures for mental health emphasize different approaches, laws, and support systems. Use the dropdown menu below to view a summarized comparison of these approaches.

    • Holistic Integration: Combines education, health, and social care services to support students with SEND, including mental health needs.

    • Early Identification: Schools are mandated to identify and address SEND and mental health concerns as early as possible.

    • Whole-School Approach: Schools promote emotional well-being throughout the school environment, not just in specialized programs.

    • Staff Training: Requires staff training to recognize mental health issues early and provide support.

    • Collaboration with Mental Health Services: Schools work with external providers to develop comprehensive support plans for students.

    • Academic-Centric Focus: Primarily provides educational support through Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) and 504 Plans.

    • Separate Legislative Frameworks: Mental health and educational support fall under different acts, with limited integration.

    • Accommodations Over Holistic Plans: Emphasis on classroom accommodations rather than integrated health and social care.

    • Parental Involvement: IEP and 504 Plan development strongly involves parents but often requires separate mental health arrangements.

    • Variable Whole-School Support: No uniform requirement for whole-school mental health approaches; practices vary across districts.

“If we don't create an environment in which every child feels safe and supported, then we are failing them. Emotional and mental well-being are as important as academic achievement.” — Sir Ken Robinson, internationally recognized leader in education, innovation and creativity.

Juxtaposing Comprehensive Support Structures

UK’s Approach to Special Needs: EHCPs in Schools

In the UK, Education, Health, and Care Plans (EHCPs) are legally binding documents designed to ensure that children with SEND receive the necessary support across education, health, and social care services. EHCPs are important in outlining the specific needs of a child, including any mental health concerns, and detailing the conditions required to help them succeed. These plans can be implemented in both special schools and mainstream schools, depending on the child's needs. Mainstream schools are increasingly incorporating mental health services, providing on-site support and working with third-party professionals to ensure that students receive comprehensive care. Regardless of the setting, the intent is on creating an environment where children’s educational and emotional well-being are equally prioritized.

In the UK, private (or independent) schools are not legally required to follow the same regulations as public schools regarding the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) Code of Practice. While state schools must adhere to the Children and Families Act (2014) and develop Education, Health, and Care Plans (EHCPs) for students with special educational needs, private schools have more flexibility in how they provide support. Some private schools choose to implement their own support structures and may offer tailored programs for students with SEND, but they are not bound by the legal framework that require specific accommodations or mental health services in state schools. Consequently, families considering private education may find that the level of SEND support varies significantly between institutions. This can make it essential for parents to closely review each school’s policies and resources to ensure that the environment will meet their child’s educational and emotional needs.

The US Model for Special Needs Support: IEPs in Schools

In the United States, Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) are central to providing tailored support for students with disabilities in public schools. Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), public schools are required to create IEPs for eligible students, outlining specific accommodations, learning goals, and support services to address each child’s unique educational needs. Special education programs within public schools are designed to offer a range of services, from specialized instruction to therapeutic support, ensuring that students have the opportunity to thrive academically and socially.

Unlike public schools, private schools are not required to provide IEPs or adhere to IDEA standards, although some private institutions voluntarily offer specialized support programs. For families choosing private education, access to individualized support may depend on the resources available at the particular school, with many families seeking additional services outside the school environment if necessary. This distinction highlights the broader accessibility of specialized services in the public education system, where federal mandates ensure that all students, regardless of disability, receive a free and appropriate education.

Key Differences Summarized:

UK and US support structures for special needs differ significantly, with unique legal frameworks and varying accessibility to tailored educational and mental health services in each country’s public and private schools. Use the dropdown menu below to view a summarized comparison of these support structures.

    • Full-Scope Support: Covers education, health, and social care needs.

    • Legal Binding in Public Schools: Mandatory in state schools, optional in private institutions.

    • Holistic Support: Aims to support the child’s complete well-being across various settings.

    • Education-Centric: Primarily addresses academic needs, mandated by IDEA.

    • Public School Requirement: Obligatory for public schools, not required in private schools.

    • Academic-Centered Support: Focuses on academic accommodations, with less emphasis on health and social care.

Staff Proficiency and Specialist Integration in School-Based Autism Services

UK Initiatives in Autism and Mental Health Support in Schools

In the UK, schools have increasingly integrated mental health support services, including access to counseling and autism specialists. The Department for Education has prioritized mental health in schools, often requiring designated mental health leads and promoting initiatives to ensure students have access to trained professionals. Many schools have direct or referral access to educational psychologists and autism specialists, who work collaboratively with teachers to adapt environments and interventions that support autistic students. However, availability varies, with greater resources typically concentrated in urban areas, and some schools still face challenges in accessing consistent specialist support.

Several UK-wide initiatives, such as The Link Programme, aim to standardize mental health and autism support across schools by equipping staff with skills to address these needs directly. Partnerships with organizations like the National Autistic Society and Place2Be also provide schools with specialist-led workshops, consultation, and resources that promote a deeper understanding of autism and mental health. Together, these efforts empower educators to support students effectively, even when specialist resources may be limited.

U.S. Schools and the Availability of Autism and Mental Health Support

In the United States, the availability of counseling, mental health professionals, and autism specialists in schools varies significantly based on district funding, location, and school size. Many public schools are under-resourced in this area, with only 55% of schools offering mental health assessments, and fewer than half providing mental health treatment options. Schools in larger districts or urban areas tend to have more professionals, such as counselors and psychologists, while rural and underfunded districts frequently lack these resources. Even when services are available, they often fail to meet recommended staff-to-student ratios, leading to overextended professionals and limited capacity for individualized support​.

For autism-specific support, formalized and consistent training for public school staff is limited and varies widely. Many schools lack the training infrastructure needed to equip staff with the skills to support students on the autism spectrum effectively. Organizations like Autism Speaks provide resources like the School Community Tool Kit, and programs such as Project AWARE offer some mental health and autism training for educators. However, access remains uneven and largely dependent on district-level initiatives and funding sources​. This disparity highlights an ongoing need for more equitable, standardized autism and mental health training across all public schools, ensuring students, regardless of location, receive the support they need.

In U.S. schools without autism-trained staff, support for autistic students typically relies on general education teachers and special education staff who may lack specific knowledge of autism. Schools often use Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) to outline accommodations, but the effectiveness of these plans depends on staff understanding of autism, which can be limited. Some schools supplement by using toolkits or online resources from organizations like Autism Speaks, though these are usually used on an as-needed basis rather than as a formal training program. Behavioral challenges are often addressed with basic management strategies or parental input, underscoring the need for consistent, comprehensive autism training across schools​.

The Mental Health Effects of Insufficient Specialized Support for Autistic Students

Without specialized support, autistic students are more likely to face mental health challenges, including anxiety, depression, and behavioral issues, due to unmet needs and pressures to fit into neurotypical environments. Research highlights that 80% of young autistic individuals report significant struggles with mental health, with many experiencing exclusion and bullying in mainstream settings. These experiences are exacerbated by limited staff awareness and resources, contributing to feelings of stress, low self-esteem, and, ultimately, poor mental health outcomes​.

The absence of trained staff can also restrict the effectiveness of behavioral strategies within IEPs. Without autism-specific training, staff may default to general disciplinary measures, which often misinterpret sensory or social challenges as behavioral issues. This can create cycles of misunderstanding and inadequate support, ultimately increasing the risk of long-term mental health issues for autistic students and negatively impacting their educational engagement and well-being​.

Key Differences Summarized:

UK and US initiatives in autism and mental health support in schools reflect different approaches. Use the dropdown menu below to view a summarized comparison of these support services.

    • Comprehensive Support Integration: Schools typically provide access to counselors, mental health leads, and autism specialists.

    • Standardized Training Initiatives: Programs like The Link Programme and partnerships with the National Autistic Society aim to equip educators with consistent autism and mental health support skills.

    • Resource Gaps Between Regions: Urban schools often have greater access to specialists, while rural schools face challenges with consistency.

    • Collaborative Approach: Autism specialists and educational psychologists work closely with teachers to adapt learning environments and interventions for autistic students.

    • Inconsistent Access to Services: Mental health and autism resources vary significantly by district, with urban schools generally having more access than rural ones.

    • Limited Autism Training: Formal autism training for staff is often lacking, with schools relying on general special education staff or resources like toolkits from Autism Speaks.

    • Funding-Dependent Availability: Access to counselors and psychologists depends largely on district funding, often resulting in stretched resources.

    • IEP Reliance for Autism Support: Support typically comes through Individualized Education Plans (IEPs), though staff may lack specific autism knowledge, impacting plan effectiveness.

    • Mental Health Risks: Without autism-specific support, autistic students face higher risks of anxiety, depression, and behavioral challenges, often worsened by exclusion in mainstream settings.

    • Staff Awareness Gaps: Limited training can lead to misinterpretation of behaviors, with general disciplinary actions often applied instead of autism-informed approaches.

    • Educational Impact: Ineffective support within IEPs due to lack of training affects students' self-esteem, belonging, and long-term mental well-being.

Corporal Punishment for Students with Disabilities in Schools

The Shift in UK Schools from Corporal Punishment to Restrictive Practices

In the United Kingdom, corporal punishment in schools has been banned for decades, with legal prohibitions extending to state schools in 1986 and to all private schools by the early 2000s. However, concerns persist regarding alternative restrictive practices used on autistic students, such as physical restraint and seclusion, which remain legally permissible under specific guidelines. These interventions are sometimes used to manage behavior deemed disruptive, yet they are often applied disproportionately to children with disabilities, including autism. Reports indicate that these practices can cause both physical injuries, such as bruising or cuts, and psychological trauma, leading children to experience heightened anxiety about attending school or interacting with teachers.

Organizations and advocates, like Positive and Active Behaviour Support Scotland (PABSS) and the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), have reported thousands of cases involving restraint and seclusion. Their findings show that, despite policy recommendations intended to limit such practices, they are still widely used in schools across the UK, with children as young as eight often subjected to these measures. Families and advocacy groups argue that restraint and seclusion can be traumatic for autistic students, leading to negative mental health impacts and hindering educational engagement. Efforts continue in Scotland, England, and Wales to develop more consistent policies and oversight around the use of restrictive practices in schools to protect the rights and well-being of autistic students and others with disabilities.

The Use of Corporal Punishment in American Education

In the U.S., corporal punishment is still legally permitted in schools in 20 states, disproportionately affecting students with disabilities, including those with autism. Studies by the ACLU and Human Rights Watch reveal that autistic students, as well as other disabled students, face corporal punishment at higher rates than their non-disabled peers, despite evidence showing that physical discipline can exacerbate their conditions and lead to long-term harm. Common forms of corporal punishment include paddling, hitting, or forcibly restraining, with some autistic students reportedly punished for behaviors directly related to their disabilities, such as repetitive movements or vocalizations. These responses often misunderstand the nature of autism, treating such behaviors as intentional misbehavior rather than manifestations of sensory or communication challenges.

The Lasting Mental Health Consequences of Corporal Punishment

The long term impact of corporal punishment on autistic students can be severe, often resulting in trauma, increased aggression, or self-harm. Parents and advocates report that some autistic students develop aversions to school, experience heightened stress, and can cause regression in their developmental progress as a connsquence. Physical punishment can lead to both physical injuries and a breakdown in trust between students and educators, further marginalizing autistic students from their learning environments and affecting their mental health adversely.

In the UK, where corporal punishment is banned in schools, concerns remain about restrictive practices like seclusion and restraint, which can have similarly damaging effects. Reports indicate that forced isolation or restraint can trigger intense distress and anxiety, leading to long-term avoidance behaviors and a diminished sense of safety at school. Both in the U.S. and the UK, advocacy groups like Human Rights Watch and the ACLU call for the adoption of positive behavioral support strategies over punitive measures. These alternatives are shown to improve student well-being, help foster a supportive educational environment, and reduce the adverse mental health effects that punishment-based methods can cause​.

Key Differences Summarized:

UK and US laws and policies differ when it comes to corporal punishment. Use the dropdown menu below to view a summarized comparison of these differences.

    • Legal Status: Corporal punishment is still legal in schools across 20 U.S. states, often affecting students with disabilities at disproportionately high rates.

    • Impact on Autistic Students: Autistic students are frequently punished for disability-related behaviors, such as repetitive movements, which can lead to increased distress and harm.

    • Misinterpretation of Behaviors: Physical discipline in response to sensory or communication challenges reflects a misunderstanding of autism, treating these behaviors as misbehavior instead of disability-related needs.

    • Legal Ban on Corporal Punishment: Corporal punishment has been banned in UK schools since 1986 (state schools) and early 2000s (private schools).

    • Use of Restrictive Practices: Physical restraint and seclusion remain legally permissible under specific conditions, often applied disproportionately to students with disabilities, including autism.

    • Impact on Autistic Students: Reports indicate that restrictive practices can lead to physical injuries and psychological trauma, causing heightened anxiety and affecting school engagement.

    • Ongoing Advocacy for Reform: Organizations like PABSS and the EHRC report high usage rates of these practices and advocate for stronger policies to protect autistic and disabled students.

    • Trauma and Behavioral Impacts: Corporal punishment can result in trauma, increased aggression, or self-harm, with many autistic students developing school aversions, heightened stress, or even regressive behaviors.

    • Breakdown in Trust: Physical punishment damages trust between students and educators, often marginalizing autistic students and affecting their mental health and engagement.

    • UK’s Concerns on Restrictive Practices: While corporal punishment is banned, practices like seclusion and restraint remain permissible, potentially causing similar distress, anxiety, and avoidance behaviors.

    • Advocacy for Positive Approaches: Organizations such as Human Rights Watch and the ACLU advocate for positive behavioral support strategies to replace punitive measures, aiming to enhance student well-being and reduce mental health harm.

“Mental health is fundamental to good health and well-being and is critical to children’s learning, development and thriving”
— UNICEF

SEL Implementation in Schools

SEL Integration in Schools in the UK

In recent years, the UK has made significant strides toward integrating Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) into schools, particularly to support students’ mental health. The UK Department for Education’s 2018 Mental Health and Wellbeing Guidance emphasizes the importance of such support, encouraging schools to adopt practices like SEL that benefit all students, including those with special education needs. In 2021, this commitment deepened through the Wellbeing for Education Return program, which provided additional funding to help schools address post-pandemic mental health challenges. Together, these policies create a foundation for SEL integration across the UK.

“If you are depressed and anxious, you are not a machine with malfunctioning parts. You are a human being with unmet needs.”
— Lost Connections: Uncovering the Real Causes of Depression–and the Unexpected Solutions, Hari 2018

Organizations like The Anna Freud Centre have supported schools by offering SEL workshops to equip teachers with the skills they need to address the diverse social and emotional needs of students, including those with autism. Through these workshops, teachers learn tools to help autistic students navigate emotions, build social skills, and thrive within inclusive classrooms.

Similarly, the Wellbeing in Schools Project in Northern Ireland, alongside the REACH and Emotional Wellbeing Teams in Schools (EWTS) programs, has shown that SEL programs benefit the entire school climate. These initiatives foster resilience, self-awareness, and empathy across school communities. The project reported that students, including those on the autism spectrum, displayed increased empathy and resilience, with teachers noting greater engagement and decreased withdrawal among autistic students. Together, these policies, training programs, and initiatives demonstrate SEL's potential to create a supportive, inclusive school environment that nurtures the mental health and well-being of all students.

SEL Initiatives in U.S. Education

In the United States, there has been a growing movement to integrate Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) into school curricula, with increasing support from both educational institutions and mental health organizations. SEL programs aim to equip students with essential skills in emotional regulation, empathy, and communication. Organizations like the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) and the Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence have been instrumental in helping schools design age-appropriate SEL curricula to meet diverse student needs.

Despite widespread support, schools encounter significant challenges in implementing SEL effectively. Funding inconsistencies mean that only schools with strong financial backing can maintain comprehensive SEL programs, and the lack of trained staff adds further obstacles, as many teachers have limited training in mental health. Additionally, the absence of standardized SEL requirements across states results in a lack of cohesion, complicating efforts to establish and sustain evidence-based SEL practices. For autistic students, SEL offers particular benefits; structured activities provide these students with opportunities to practice social interaction and emotional recognition in supportive environments, potentially boosting social skills, self-confidence, and overall well-being.

To overcome funding and resource limitations, several initiatives have emerged nationwide. State and local governments increasingly offer grants and pilot programs to schools committed to SEL, helping ease financial constraints. For instance, federal funding under Title IV, Part A of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) has supported SEL integration, allowing schools to allocate resources for SEL training and curriculum development. Additionally, organizations like CASEL have partnered with state education departments to align SEL with academic standards, supporting budget allocations within existing educational frameworks.

Key Differences Summarized:

The UK and US take distinct approaches to integrating Social and Emotional Learning in schools, with differences in funding, standardization, and support structures. Use the dropdown menu below to view a summarized comparison of these differences.

    • Government-Backed Support: The UK Department for Education emphasizes SEL in its Mental Health and Wellbeing Guidance, and initiatives like the Wellbeing for Education Return program offer funding to support post-pandemic mental health needs.

    • Specialized Training: Organizations such as The Anna Freud Centre provide workshops to equip teachers with SEL tools, benefiting all students, including those with autism.

    • Nationwide Initiatives: Programs like the Wellbeing in Schools Project and REACH promote SEL across school communities, fostering resilience, empathy, and engagement for students, including those on the autism spectrum.

    • Support from Organizations: CASEL and the Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence assist schools in developing age-appropriate SEL curricula for diverse student needs.

    • Funding Challenges: SEL program availability depends heavily on school funding, with many schools facing limitations in sustaining comprehensive SEL initiatives.

    • Lack of Standardization: Without standardized SEL requirements across states, implementation varies widely, creating challenges in establishing cohesive, evidence-based practices.

    • Federal and State Grants: State and local governments offer grants and pilot programs to schools dedicated to SEL, helping to reduce financial barriers.

    • Title IV, Part A Funding: Federal funding from the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) supports SEL training and curriculum, enabling schools to invest in SEL development.

    • Partnerships with Organizations: CASEL collaborates with state education departments to integrate SEL with academic standards, encouraging budget allocation within educational frameworks.

“If we don't create an environment in which every child feels safe and supported, then we are failing them. Emotional and mental well-being are as important as academic achievement.” — Sir Ken Robinson, internationally recognized leader in education, innovation and creativity.

Perceptions Shaping Autism and Mental Health in Education

UK Perspective: NHS Influence and Public Perception of Autism and Mental Health

In the UK, the NHS helps shape the public perception and policy concerning mental health and autism support in schools. The NHS’s focus on universal healthcare establishes a baseline for mental health awareness in educational settings. Despite their efforts, stigmas in relation to mental health and autism may still be prevalent in the community. Misconceptions, such as assuming autistic behaviors are merely obstinance and disciplinary issues, can create barriers to effective support and guidance.

These stigmas and misunderstandings are seen amongst all members of educational staff, from teachers and support aides to transportation personnel like bus drivers. Many well-intentioned educators lack sufficient training in autism and mental health, which can unintentionally lead to harmful stereotypes and inadequate support for autistic students, often causing more harm than contributing to their progress.

Public funding models in the UK offer a structured pathway for mental health and autism support in schools through the NHS, though access can vary by region, and wait times for services are often lengthy. Additionally, the assessment process itself can be not only extensive but also traumatic for students, as some find the nature of assessment questions invasive or humiliating. This experience can negatively impact students’ motivation to seek help in the future. Despite these challenges, NHS funding ensures that basic services are available to all, with less reliance on private services. However, private assessments or therapies are available for those who seek and can afford them, often resulting in quicker access to support. The NHS model, while universal, often limits the speed and breadth of care, creating a public service that, although basic, is supplemented by private options for more immediate needs.

US Perspective: The Role of Advocacy Groups and Insurance Challenges

In the US, advocacy groups such as Autism Speaks and the Autism Society of America have worked to raise awareness and push for better support structures in education, which has helped to challenge misconceptions. However, mental health care access remains highly dependent on insurance. While public schools are required to provide basic services, many critical services, such as intensive behavioral therapies, are only available privately due to its high expense.

Insurance coverage for autism-related mental health services often excludes or limits essential support, leaving working parents in a frustrating position—many cannot afford the high out-of-pocket costs for necessary services. Other families are forced to reduce their income to qualify for Medicaid, which offers more comprehensive coverage. This system indirectly pressures families into financial hardship to access the care their children need. This can lead some families to face overwhelming challenges in sustaining their household, creating an avalanche of new problems as they cope with both the financial strain and emotional stress that undermine family stability and well-being. Many are forced into an impossible ultimatum: to choose between securing essential mental health support for their autistic child or preserving the financial means necessary for their family's survival and growth.

Key Differences Summarized:

Perceptions and support structures for autism and mental health in education differ significantly between the UK and US, shaped by distinct healthcare influences, public attitudes, and, in the US, a reliance on insurance-based access and advocacy efforts. Use the dropdown menu below to view a summarized comparison of these support services.

    • Universal Healthcare Impact: The NHS promotes mental health awareness in schools, providing a structured pathway for autism and mental health support, though regional access and wait times vary.

    • Persistent Stigmas: Despite NHS efforts, misconceptions about autism, such as viewing autistic behaviors as obstinance, remain, impacting support quality.

    • Lack of Training: Many educators lack specialized training, leading to unintentional stereotypes and limited understanding of autism and mental health needs.

    • Public vs. Private Access: NHS funding covers basic services for all students, though private options allow quicker access for families who can afford them, supplementing limited public resources.

    • Advocacy Efforts: Organizations like Autism Speaks and the Autism Society of America work to raise autism awareness and support, challenging public misconceptions.

    • Insurance-Dependent Access: Access to mental health care is largely reliant on insurance, with many critical services, such as intensive therapies, only available privately.

    • Limited Coverage: Insurance often excludes or restricts essential autism-related services, placing families in difficult financial positions to obtain necessary support.

    • Financial Hardship: Some families reduce income to qualify for Medicaid’s broader coverage, facing an ultimatum between affording basic living expenses or securing vital mental health support for their autistic child.

The Impact of Autism Misconceptions on Student Support

The Impact of Misconceptions and Oversights on Autism and Safety in U.K. School Buses

Cases specific to bus-related abuse of autistic children in the UK are rare, misunderstandings about autism, compounded by a lack of specialized training, continue to create considerable oversights in safety and support for these students in school environments. This lack of knowledge can lead to underestimating the risks associated with autistic behaviors, such as the risk of elopement, potentially resulting in inadequate supervision and compromising student welfare.

A notable example involved a special school where staff failed to prevent an autistic child from eloping on multiple occasions. Despite risk assessments indicating the need for close supervision, the necessary measures were not implemented, leaving the child vulnerable to harm. Following a formal investigation, the incident led to policy revisions that prioritized safeguarding and autism-specific training for staff to better meet the needs of students with autism.

The Impact of Misconceptions on Autism and Safety in U.S. School Buses

In the school environment, misconceptions about autism and mental health are widespread, creating barriers for both staff and school bus drivers. Teachers and drivers may interpret certain behaviors as disruptive or unmanageable, overlooking the autism-related needs that underlie them. This lack of awareness not only limits their ability to support students but can also escalate situations, placing students at risk of harmful misunderstandings and interventions that jeopardize their well-being.

Recent U.S. cases expose these severe failures in safeguarding autistic students' well-being. In Darien, Connecticut, video evidence showed a bus aide physically abusing an autistic student, leading to criminal charges. Similarly, a federal investigation in Littleton, Colorado, examined allegations of a bus aide beating non-verbal autistic students, which was captured on video and involved the aide allegedly hitting the child. While in Methuen, Massachusetts, two bus employees were arrested and charged with abusing a non-verbal autistic child. These incidents further stress the urgent need for better training and oversight of staff members.

Key Differences Summarized:

Misconceptions about autism impact safety and oversight on school buses in both the UK and US, with differing levels of training and safeguarding measures.

    • Safety Oversights Due to Misunderstandings: Limited autism-specific training for school staff and bus drivers leads to gaps in understanding safety risks, such as elopement.

    • Inadequate Supervision: Incidents of autistic students eloping have revealed failures to implement necessary safeguards, prompting policy changes to improve training and support.

    • Policy Revisions: Following incidents, policies now prioritize autism-specific training to enhance student safety and awareness.

    • Misinterpretation of Behaviors: Widespread misconceptions lead school staff and bus drivers to misjudge autism-related behaviors, often escalating situations unnecessarily.

    • Documented Abuse Cases: Recent cases in states like Connecticut, Colorado, and Massachusetts reveal severe safeguarding failures, with incidents of physical abuse recorded on video.

    • Need for Training and Oversight: These cases highlight the critical need for better autism training and oversight to prevent harm and improve support for autistic students on school buses.

Teacher Training

UK Training Standards for Autism Support in SEN

When it comes to teacher training in the UK, SEN training is consistently included as part of the certification process. This training often includes autism and mental health awareness as core components. It equips teachers with strategies for supporting neurodiverse students in inclusive classrooms. These standards are generally uniform, as outlined by the Department for Education, which ensures that teachers across the UK acquire a baseline competency in autism awareness and mental health support. Additional support often comes from partnerships with mental health organizations, like Place2Be, though implementation can vary depending on the specific school or region.

U.S. Teacher Training and Preparedness for Autism Support

In the US, autism-specific teacher training is less commonly required. While state requirements for teacher certification generally include some introductory content on diverse learning needs, autism-specific training is often relegated to optional professional development courses rather than embedded in initial certification requirements. Teachers report feeling unprepared to effectively support autistic students without additional, structured training​. This lack of required training can create barriers to effective inclusion and teacher competency especially in schools without dedicated special education resources.

Only a limited number of states mandate autism-specific training for teachers, with even fewer providing funding to support this requirement. In states like New York, autism-specific training is required for certain educators, such as those working in special education. The expenses are often covered through district or state funding and ensures a baseline competency in supporting autistic students in inclusive settings. In states where autism training isn’t mandated or funded, teachers often shoulder the costs themselves, making it a substantial out-of-pocket expense and offering little incentive to pursue a specialization in special education.

As a result, without the support of state funding or certification requirements, teachers may lack motivation to undergo this training, leading to variability in autism support quality across classrooms.

Key points summarized:

Teacher training standards for autism support vary between the UK and US, impacting preparedness and consistency in supporting autistic students. Use the dropdown menu below to view a summarized comparison of these training standards.

    • Consistent SEN Training: SEN training, including autism and mental health awareness, is a standard part of teacher certification, ensuring baseline competency across the UK.

    • Uniform Standards: The Department for Education sets national standards, helping teachers acquire consistent skills to support neurodiverse students in inclusive settings.

    • Additional Support from Partnerships: Schools often collaborate with organizations like Place2Be, though resources may vary by region.

    • Limited Autism-Specific Training: Autism training is typically optional rather than required, often relegated to professional development rather than certification.

    • Variable State Mandates: Only a few states, like New York, mandate autism training for specific educators, with limited funding for these requirements.

    • Financial Barriers for Teachers: In states without funding or mandates, teachers often bear the cost of training, resulting in inconsistent autism support quality across schools.

“Eighty-six percent of U.S. K-12 public schools reported challenges hiring teachers for the 2023-24 school year, with 83 percent reporting trouble hiring for non-teacher positions, such as classroom aides, transportation staff, and mental health professionals”
— National Center for Education Statistics, October 17, 2023)
“Corporal punishment is associated with increased aggression, antisocial behavior, physical injury, and mental health problems for children and youth, with no evidence of improved behavior in the long term.”
— American Psychological Association (APA)

Impacts and Consequences of Teacher Shortages

The Broader Impacts of Teacher Shortages on UK Schools

Teacher shortages are prominent in the UK and has been a growing concern in recent years. This shortage is affecting mainstream and special education, and contributing to escalating anxieties about the quality of support for students with additional needs. Burnout, primarily from heavy workloads, low pay, and inadequate support are a key drivers pushing many educators to seek alternative roles that offer improved work-life balance and reduced stress. This often forces schools to rely on unqualified staff or mainstream settings that may not meet students' specialized needs effectively​.

As a result, many teachers are transitioning to online education roles, private tutoring, or administrative positions that offer greater flexibility and allow them to continue working in education with less daily stress. Remote and online roles reduce commute time and often enable better work-life balance. Tutoring and online platforms also provide more control over schedules and often allow teachers to set higher hourly rates, particularly in specialized subjects. This autonomy and flexibility provide a refreshing contrast to the rigid structures and standardized demands of the public education system​.

Understanding the Impacts of Teacher Shortages Across U.S. Schools

The teacher shortage in the US is more severe than in the UK, and it extends far beyond classroom. American teachers often face a range of demands that go well beyond just teaching. Teachers face immense stress due to the increased responsibilities placed on them, including managing safety protocols amid rising concerns about violence and school safety. The threat of violence, including school shootings, places an additional burden on teachers, who must manage safety protocols and emergency preparedness while trying to maintain a conducive learning environment. This added layer of responsibility intensifies the pressure on educators and contributes to higher stress levels, further exacerbating burnout and attrition.

Another significant factor is the lack of funding for classroom supplies. Many teachers have to pay out of pocket for basic materials to keep their classrooms running smoothly. This financial strain, coupled with low salaries and high workload, leads to growing dissatisfaction among educators.

Special education faces significant challenges in the US, with shortages of qualified staff putting extra pressure on those who remain. The inconsistency in state-level funding often worsens the issue, making the problem particularly severe in certain areas. When schools don't have enough special education teachers, they frequently rely on non-specialist or general education teachers to fill the gaps. This can mean that students with special needs miss out on specialized instruction and tailored support, affecting their educational progress and development.

In response to shortages, schools may also delegate more responsibilities to teaching assistants or paraprofessionals, sometimes beyond their training or expertise. Additionally, schools might combine special education classes or increase the student-to-teacher ratio, making it difficult to provide the individualized attention that many students with special needs require. These temporary measures can compromise the quality of education and leave special education students underserved, adding strain to an already overburdened system.

Key points summarized:

Teacher training standards for addressing teacher shortages vary between the UK and US, impacting preparedness and consistency in maintaining educational quality and support for students. Use the dropdown menu below to view a summarized comparison of these training standards.

    • Growing Concerns: Teacher shortages affect both mainstream and special education, raising concerns about support quality for students with additional needs.

    • Burnout and Attrition: Heavy workloads, low pay, and insufficient support drive teachers to leave for roles offering better work-life balance, such as private tutoring or administrative positions.

    • Shift to Flexible Roles: Educators increasingly transition to online education or tutoring, where they can control their schedules, reduce commute times, and often earn higher pay, reducing stress compared to public education roles.

    • Severe Shortages and Added Pressures: Teacher shortages are more severe than in the UK, with additional burdens like managing safety protocols amid violence concerns, which elevate stress and contribute to burnout.

    • Financial Strain: Teachers often pay out of pocket for classroom supplies due to inadequate funding, compounding low salaries and heavy workloads, leading to dissatisfaction.

    • Special Education Challenges: Shortages of qualified special education staff force schools to rely on general education teachers or paraprofessionals, impacting the quality of specialized instruction.

    • Temporary Solutions and Their Effects: Increased reliance on teaching assistants, combined classes, or higher student-to-teacher ratios compromises individualized support for special needs students, straining the education system further.

References:

  1. Anna Freud Centre., What was the Link Programme?, www.annafreud.org/services/services-for-professionals/past-school-and-college-programmes/the-link-programme/. Accessed 25 Oct. 2024

  2. APRAIS. Stop Hurting Kids., (2020) Resources. https://www.stophurtingkids.com/resources. Accessed 27 Oct. 2024

  3. Austen Riggs Center. (2024) Loneliness, Belonging, and the Mental Health Crisis in School-Aged Children. https://education.austenriggs.org/content/roundtable-3-loneliness-belonging-and-mental-health-crisis-school-aged-children-moderated-0#group-tabs-node-course-default2. Accessed Oct. 2024

  4. Autism Society of America., n.d., Teacher & Staff Requirements. www.autismsociety.org/resources/education/teacher-staff-requirements/. Accessed 28 Oct. 2024

  5. Autism Speaks., n.d., How General Education Teachers Can Support Students with ASD. www.autismspeaks.org/blog/how-general-education-teachers-can-support-students-asd, Accessed 28 Oct. 2024

  6. Autistic Realms., n.d., Education Crisis: Neurodiversity-Affirming Teacher Training Needed. www.autisticrealms.com/post/education-crisis-neurodiversity-affirming-teacher-training-needed, Accessed 28 Oct. 2024

  7. The Big Issue., (2024) Teachers Forced to Choose Which Special Needs Children Get Help as Funding Crisis Worsens. www.bigissue.com/news/social-justice/special-educational-needs-sen-funding-crisis-uk-schools/, Accessed 28 Oct. 2024

  8. BioNexus Health., n.d., Autism Special Education Laws and Rights in the USA. www.bionexushealth.com/environmental-illness/autism/education/autism-special-education-laws-rights-usa/. Accessed 28 Oct. 2024

  9. Brewer, Dominic J., Career Paths and Quit Decisions: Evidence from Teaching. Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 14, no. 2, 1996, pp. 313–39. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2535355. Accessed 2 Nov. 2024

  10. CALDER, The Urban Institute, Dan Goldhaber, Betheny Gross, and Daniel Player. 2009. Teacher Career Paths, Teacher Quality, and Persistence in the Classroom. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509679.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov. 2024

  11. CASEL. Leading Schoolwide SEL., (2022) An Introduction to Social and Emotional Learning. https://leadingschoolwidesel.casel.org/courses/intro-to-sel. Accessed 27 Feb. 2023

  12. CDC., (2023) About Mental Health. https://www.cdc.gov/mentalhealth. Accessed 15 Oct. 2024

  13. CDC., (2018) Well-being Concepts. https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/hrqol/wellbeing.htm. Accessed 15 Oct. 2024

  14. Child Mind Institute., (2023) The Controversy Around ABA. https://childmind.org/article/controversy-around-applied-behavior-analysis/. Accessed 18 Oct. 2024

  15. Cozart L. UC Davis., (2023) Emotional and Social Intelligence. https://www.coursera.org/learn/emotional-and-social-intelligence. Accessed 4 Oct. 2023

  16. Department for Education. GOV.UK, (2018) Mental Health and Wellbeing Provision in Schools. www.gov.uk/government/publications/mental-health-and-wellbeing-provision-in-schools. Accessed 27 Oct. 2024

  17. Department for Education and Department of Health and Social Care. Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice: 0 to 25 Years. GOV.UK, Jan. 2015, www.gov.uk/government/publications/send-code-of-practice-0-to-25. Accessed 16 Oct. 2024

  18. Department for Education, and Department of Health and Social Care., (2017) Transforming Children and Young People’s Mental Health Provision: A Green Paper. HM Government, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a823518e5274a2e87dc1b56/Transforming_children_and_young_people_s_mental_health_provision.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct. 2024

  19. Department of Education, Northern Ireland., (2021) Emotional Health and Wellbeing. www.education-ni.gov.uk/articles/emotional-health-and-wellbeing. Accessed 27 Oct. 2024

  20. EachOther., (2022) A Case 40 Years Ago Led to Ban on Beating Children in State Schools. https://eachother.org.uk/a-case-40-years-ago-led-to-ban-on-beating-children-in-state-schools/. Accessed 26 Oct. 2024

  21. Education Authority Northern Ireland. REACH Programme., (2024) Education Authority Northern Ireland. www.eani.org.uk/reach. Accessed 27 Oct. 2024

  22. Farmer, Alice. ACLU., (2009) Impairing Education: Corporal Punishment of Students with Disabilities in US Public Schools. https://www.aclu.org/publications/impairing-education-corporal-punishment-students-disabilities-us-public-schools. Accessed 26 Oct. 2024

  23. Georgia Educational Researcher, Johnson, Alison; Soares, Lina; and Gutierrez de Blume, Antonio P., (2021) Professional Development for Working with Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Teacher Self-Efficacy. Vol. 18, Iss. 1, Article 1, Accessed 28 Oct. 2024

  24. Global Initiative to End All Corporal Punishment of Children., (2024) End Corporal Punishment, https://endcorporalpunishment.org/reports-on-every-state-and-territory/uk/. Accessed 26 Oct. 2024

  25. Hoodline., (2023) Autistic Mass. Child Allegedly Abused by Bus Employees: Methuen Family’s Nightmare Sparks Investigation. www.hoodline.com/2023/10/autistic-mass-child-allegedly-abused-by-bus-employees-methuen-family-s-nightmare-sparks-investigation/, Accessed 28 Oct. 2024

  26. Human Rights Watch and American Civil Liberties Union., (2009) Impairing Education: Corporal Punishment of Students with Disabilities in US Public Schools. https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/08/10/impairing-education/corporal-punishment-students-disabilities-us-public-schools. Accessed 26 Oct. 2024

  27. Human Rights Watch., (2009) US: Students with Disabilities Face Corporal Punishment at Higher Rates. https://www.hrw.org/news/2009/08/10/us-students-disabilities-face-corporal-punishment-higher-rates. Accessed 26 Oct. 2024

  28. Hussman Institute for Autism., Supporting Students with Special Needs: Instructional Strategies. https://www.scaffolds.org/courses/sssn/instruct/story_html5.html. Accessed 24 Sept. 2024 2024

  29. Hussman Institute for Autism., (2019) Supporting Students with Special Needs: Autism. https://www.scaffolds.org/courses/sssn/autism/story_html5.html. Accessed 24 Sept. 2024

  30. Hussman Institute for Autism., (2019) Supporting Students with Special Needs: Positive Behavior Supports. https://www.scaffolds.org/courses/sssn/behavior/story_html5.html. Accessed 24 Sept. 2024

  31. Hussman Institute for Autism., Supporting Students with Special Needs: Presuming Competence. https://www.scaffolds.org/courses/sssn/competence/story_html5.html. Accessed 26 Sept. 2024

  32. Hussman Institute for Autism., Supporting Students with Special Needs: Understanding Roles and Responsibilities. https://www.scaffolds.org/courses/sssn/roles/story_html5.html. Accessed 27 Oct. 2024

  33. IBB Law., n.d., Failure of Special School to Prevent Autistic Boy from Absconding. www.ibblaw.co.uk/insights/failure-of-special-school-to-prevent-autistic-boy-from-absconding, Accessed 27 Oct. 2024

  34. Institute of Education Sciences, ERIC, Bertuccio, Rebecca F.; Runion, Megan C.; Culler, Erica D.; Moeller, Jeremy D.; and Hall, Cristin M., (2019) A Comparison of Autism-Specific Training Outcomes for Teachers and Paraeducators. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=training+in+autism&id=EJ1231529, Accessed 28 Oct. 2024

  35. National Association of Special Education Teachers., n.d., Autism Spectrum Disorders. www.naset.org/professional-resources/exceptional-students-and-disability-information/autism/autism-spectrum-disorders, Accessed 28 Oct. 2024

  36. National Autistic Society., www.autism.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/topics/education. Accessed 26 Oct. 2024

  37. National Center for Education Statistics., (2023) Most Public Schools Face Challenges in Hiring Teachers and Other Personnel Entering the 2023-24 Academic Year. www.nces.ed.gov/whatsnew/press_releases/10_17_2023.asp, Accessed 28 Oct. 2024.

  38. NBC New York, Adam Harding and Amanda Plasencia., (2023) CT School Bus Aide Bit Boy, Licked Face, and Wiped Mucus During Rides. https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/ct-school-bus-aide-bit-boy-licked-face-and-wiped-mucus-during-rides/5546931/. Accessed 27 Oct. 2024

  39. New York State Education Department., n.d., Autism. www.nysed.gov/special-education/autism, Accessed 28 Oct. 2024

  40. New York State United Teachers., n.d., Autism Training. https://elt.nysut.org/professional-learning/autism-training. Accessed 28 Oct. 2024

  41. NHS., (2023) A Defining Moment in Health Care. https://www.england.nhs.uk/blog Accessed 5 Oct. 2024

  42. NHS Digital., (2023) Wellbeing. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information Accessed 5 Oct. 2024

  43. PBS, Meghan Sullivan., (2023) What's Driving a Special Education Teacher Shortage — and How Schools Are Responding. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/whats-driving-a-special-education-teacher-shortage-and-how-schools-are-responding. Accessed 2 Nov. 2024

  44. Phillips, Lindsey. American Counseling Association., (2023) A Closer Look at the Mental Health Provider Shortage. https://www.counseling.org/publications/counseling-today-magazine/article-archive/article/legacy/a-closer-look-at-the-mental-health-provider-shortage. Accessed 26 Oct. 2024

  45. Place2Be., Mental Health Support in Schools. www.place2be.org.uk. Accessed 25 Oct. 2024

  46. Protocol Education., 2022, Why the UK Is Crying Out for Special Needs Teachers. www.protocol-education.com/blog/2022/07/why-the-uk-is-crying-out-for-special-needs-teachers, Accessed 28 Oct. 2024

  47. RAND Corporation, Heather L. Schwartz, Melissa Kay Diliberti, David Grant, Gerald P. Hunter, and Sy Doan. 2023. Teachers' Views on School Safety. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2641-1.html. Accessed 2 Nov. 2024

  48. Remote UK., n.d., Exploring Advantages and Challenges of Work-from-Home Jobs. www.remoteuk.co.uk/resources/exploring-advantages-and-challenges-of-work-from-home-jobs, Accessed 28 Oct. 2024.

  49. The Colorado Sun, Jesse Paul., (2024) More Charges Filed Against Littleton School Bus Aide Accused of Abusing Nonverbal Students. https://coloradosun.com/2024/05/03/more-charges-filed-littleton-bus-aide-nonverbal-students-abus/. Accessed 27 Oct. 2024

  50. The Independent., n.d., Headteachers warn UK facing ‘dangerous’ teacher shortage as recruitment crisis deepens. www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/teacher-recruitment-crisis-shortage-warning-b2349753.html, Accessed 28 Oct. 2024

  51. The Open University., (2024) Teacher Development: Embedding Mental Health in the Curriculum. https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/embedding-mental-health-pg. Accessed 28 Oct. 2024​

  52. Unison., (2022) Children with Special Needs Feeling the Brunt of Staffing Shortages. www.unison.org.uk/news/article/2022/02/children-with-special-needs-feeling-the-brunt-of-staffing-shortages-unison-survey-reveals/, Accessed 28 Oct. 2024

  53. University of Colorado Boulder., (2019) SEL for Students: A Path to Social Emotional Well-Being. https://www.coursera.org/learn/sel-for-students. Accessed 17 Mar. 2023

  54. University of Colorado Boulder. (2019) The Teacher's Social and Emotional Learning. https://www.coursera.org/learn/teachers-social-emotional-learning. Accessed 27 Oct. 2024​

  55. University of Kent., (2022) Autistic People’s Rights and the Law. https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/autism-and-the-legal-issues. Accessed 17 May. 2023

  56. University of Kent., (2022) Autistic Health: Improving Access to Healthcare. https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/autism-and-healthcare Accessed 18 May. 2023

  57. U.S. Department of Education, n.d. National Center for Education Statistics., Mental health services in public schools, https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=1130. Accessed 26 Oct. 2024

  58. Vanderbilt University, The IRIS Center., (2019) IEPs: Developing High-Quality Individualized Education Programs. https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/product/iep01/. Accessed 1 Sept. 2024​

  59. Vanderbilt University. The IRIS Center., (2019) IEPs: How Administrators Can Support the Development and Implementation of High-Quality IEPs. https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/product/iep02/. Accessed 1 Sept. 2024

  60. WCVB, Staff Report., (2023) Methuen School Bus Monitors Accused of Child Abuse in Massachusetts. https://www.wcvb.com/article/methuen-school-bus-child-abuse-allegations-massachusetts/45453540. Accessed 27 Oct. 2024

  61. Wellbeing Return to Education., (2021) Emotionally Friendly Settings. www.emotionallyfriendly.co.uk/resources/wellbeing-return-to-education-wer/. Accessed 27 Oct. 2024

  62. Wikipedia., (2023) Michelle Dawson. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Dawson Accessed 18 Oct. 2024

  63. Wikipedia, Contributors. Last edited 21 Oct. 2024. Teacher Retention. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teacher_retention. Accessed 2 Nov. 2024.